This from the profile of one of our members Sam:
There once lived a young man named Sam,
Who breezed through the Darwin exam,
If you like what you see,
Then get hold of me,
By email (failing that…tel-e-gram)
As you can see, not only are Darwin Dating members hot, but they are creative too! Ladies, Sam lives in London and is looking for hotties between the ages of 18-28!
Darwin Dating:
“Dear Justin, welcome to the harsh reality of life, you are not attractive enough to make it onto Darwin Dating and probably aren’t very attractive, period!
There are plenty of other ugly people out there and we have proof. Many people who have applied for membership have been rejected. ‘Successful’ people like Russell Crowe, George W. Bush, Venus and Serena Williams and Margaret Thatcher would never have been made members, so maybe there is still some hope for you.
There are plenty of products out there that may help reduce your ugliness. Try a few of these: hair gel, contact lenses, soap.All the best with your ugliness!
Justin:
“I f***ed your mother”
Nice try, but my mother has taste. 
We get a lot of emails from our members requesting this and that. We thought we’d post this one in an effort to encourage more ugly people to be honest.
Mark: “Fellas – could you delete my account please…I’ve recently had horribly disfiguring facial surgery and my pic now looks nothing like me…”
Darwin Dating: “Mark, I have deleted your account. Thanks for letting us know, the last thing we want on the site is horribly disfigured people, your honesty is appreciated. Yours in hot people, Darwin Dating.”
Even though you are obviously quite ugly, you should be proud Mark. The hot members of Darwin Dating thank you.
Our rule against red hair and freckles appears to have sparked a bit of a debate.
This from Kate:
“Certain shades of red hair (ie, dark auburn) are, in fact, hot- but only for the ladies! I understand keeping the orange-haired men off of your site, but not this whole blanket ban of red hair/freckles. I suggest that you amend that rule the way you did the fishnet stocking one. Thanks!” (link added by DD).
About 2 weeks ago we heard from Rob:
Rob: “The Red Hair Rule is a bit grey. I got red hair, I’m also hot…and buff. Its not that rosey ginger bright carrot red, its more…auburn’ish, but it is still rightly ‘red‘ hair. This rule should specify the severity of red hair. Just a suggestion”
DD: “Hi Rob, You make a fair point. I suggest you upload your photo and we can let the members decide whether auburnish hair can make it. If you make it in I will adjust the rules accordingly.
Rob: “Haha, good stuff.”
And that’s the last we heard from Rob. Did he make it? I guess not… yep, the rule still stands.
Darwin Dating has received a bit of traffic of late and with traffic comes hate mail! Hooray!
Some of the better quotes:
“i have no words… you are going to whatever you beliefs constitutes as hell when you die. fucken nazis.”
“Listing red hair as an ugly characteristic makes you ugly and stupid, worst of all RACIST PIGS”
“Did you hear the one about the retarded dating site that tries to impose its view of beauty on everyone else? What, you dont believe me? Well, its true. Apparently, they won’t accept anyone with, for example, red hair or freckles. They don’t seem to realise that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, which means they have absolutely no fucking right to decide what it is on behalf of anyone else. They fail to realise that some people find red hair ATTRACTIVE, for example. They fail to realise that not everyone thinks anyone wider than a hair is an eyesore. They fail to realise that some people find botox-induced statuism disgusting. Yes, I know, I found it hard to believe too, I was astonished that such morons actually exist.”
How ugly do you reckon these 3 are?
The UK Metro is hot, the Chicago Tribune is hot (tho a little less so cause u have to register to read their articles) and even New Scientist is hot!
Mr. PZ Myers and his friends at scienceblogs claim that Darwin Dating has no scientific merit. While technically they might be right, their thoughts makes for some interesting reading:
“What’s really ironic is that Charles Darwin was brilliant, held deep friendships throughout his life, was a caring and devoted husband and doting father, and he was rich, yet a site that claims to have an algorithm for finding excellent mates admits that it would reject him.”
Damn straight, he was so ugly he married his cousin!
“don’t knock this ‘Darwin Dating’ site; it’s self-selecting, and it keeps some really shallow people where they belong… in the shallow end of the gene pool”
Haha, don’t really have a comeback to that other than our members are HOT!
“Sites like this make me wish I was a hacker.”
Haha, I guess we’re glad you’re not!
“Any dating site that isn’t intended for singles living in the area in and around Darwin, Australia (or any other state/country) shouldn’t call itself this unless they want to be ridiculed. Apparently for them, intelligence isn’t a trait worth selecting for…”
Err, it doesn’t appear to be a trait your parents thought was worth selecting for either, Darwin = Charles Darwin. I thought science geeks were smart?
“Ironically, infertility doesn’t merit a banning from the site. So it doesn’t seem they follow through on their lame reasoning. “
Do you want to collect the sperm samples so we can check each applicant?
