One of our members has come to our defense following the last scathing post:
HIS IS FOR ALL THE PEOPLE WHO KEEP MOANING BECAUSE THEY GOT TURNED DOWN BY DARWIN DATING.
Get over it. Besides Dariwin Dating are not the only ones who go on looks. We all do, including you, you hypocrites. How many times have you guys said “Phwar. She is really fit. Wouldn’t mind getting to know her”. How many times have you women smiled at a man because you think he is “cute” or “goodlooking”. All of us go on looks to some extent as the physical side of a relationship is just as important as the emotional side. ALL OF US, at some point in our lives, have gone on looks and probably still do. Of course the inner qualites matter. It is all about striking a balance between the two. All you you people who got rejected are so hypocritical when you criticize this site as you would not be attracted to some one who is completly unattractive in the physical sense.
I was fortunate enough to be accepted onto this site. All of us on here admit that looks to play a part but are not the only thing that are important. If looks are not important why is it that men AND WOMEN are attracted to goodlooking members of the opposite sex. It’s just that some of us are willing to admit that looks do play a CONTRIBUTING part instead of getting all P.C. about it and pretending they don’t.
Thanks to this unnamed, beautiful member!
As a scientist who studies human sexuality through an evolutionary lens, I have to tell you that I was intrigued to see the under pinning of this site. I love the concept and I had a good laugh when I did your “chimp” survey (I fall between and earthworm and a chimp, goody!). There is one thing I think you need to add in your selection criteria. Natural selection is about gene survival right? So you MUST also not allow people who have had plastic surgery to be considered into your group! They are just uglies with funding and that ugliness will live on in other forms if you allow them to become members. There is nothing worse then falling in love and mating with this seemingly attractive person only to discover that your offspring look like Quasimodo. And SURE the kids can have mommy or daddy’s nasty little secret snipped but in the meantime while they are waiting for maturity YOU are the one who has to walk around with hideously repulsive offspring. So please, I implore you, for the sake of humanity, a ban on plastic parts is an imperative for your list of criteria.
Hi Melanie,
My name is Ola and I posted the original comment you replied to. I just wanted to say that as a man, I couldn’t agree with you more about plastic surgery. Apart from the science angle that you came from, I just find fake women a real turn off. Sure, they may look the part but part of that look looks totally false. May send your average 16-18 young man into a sexual frenzy but a man with any reall taste would tend to keep clear. On a personel level, sure, looks, amongst other qualities in a women, are important to me BUT they must be natural. Don’t like women who where to much make up as this also gives a false impression. A little is ok althogh I have been known to say that women who are really attractive don’t need make up at all.
To Summise, I agree with you. Cosmetic surgery is not a good thing.
Ola Okunniwa
Darwimisn is important in matchmaking, but you’ve gone about it backwards. The human race will never evolve so long as the lesser evolved monkeys choose mates based on the more primite physical attributes. This world is in crises and a speedy solution is needed. Thus, I think a dating site should be created, based on darwinism, that matches the most intelligent, clever, quick thinking and compassionate people….maybe the top 5%.
Admission to the site should be based on an IQ test and an EQ test- one judging intelligence and the other emotion intelligence. This is the only way humans can ever hope to leave the jungle.
Cheers!
Somehow i missed the point. Probably lost in translation
Anyway … nice blog to visit.
cheers, Passably.
I totally agree with the part above ‘In our defense’.
It all goes hand in hand. We all want someone we are both physically and ‘mentally’ (character) attracted too. The bigger the physical attraction the better, imagine the influence on your sex life.
But at the same time, if we’re really honest, people looking for a relationship want someone you really click with as well. A friend, a buddy, a mate. Whether it is someone a lot like you, or very different. In any way someone you just love to be around, you love to spend time with, you love to share your experiences, emotions and everything with. And the bigger that ‘mental’ or ‘personality’ attraction, the better as well.
For a lasting relationship, I think you need all that, but especially when you first meet people, the outside is playing a very big part.
I think some of you have it all wrong. This site isn’t about love or intelligence. It’s about being really really good looking. I agree that all good lookingness should spring from the loins and not from the coins. You can’t buy the dashing, glorious looks that nature provides. However, I see a deeper issue at hand. There are many intruders, bad apples if you will. You know what is said of bad apples. Just in case you don’t, you should know that one bad apple spoils the whole bunch. Darwindating is at risk. Its integrity is compromised by spurious babes and studs. YOU MUST PURGE PEOPLE, PURGE THE UNCLEAN! Use a keen eye and sound judgement. Our future is depending on it.
thank you,
Joel
Creators – you guys have Dalton’s theory of natural selection and sexual selection confused. Looks have nothing to do with survival, a person can be fit and may be still rejected from your website. You also have a combination of two laws – Galton’s theory of superior breeding (eugenics) and Dalton’s sexual selection confused. Funny how I never got any replies back whenI emailed you guys several weeks ago. I wonder if there’s censorship with comments. Probably. I bet there are many people who noticed the theories were mixed up.
Credibility is lost if you can’t get the theories right people!
It’s not very honorable for a non-creator to have to come to defense for the creators of this website as you guys receive quite a bit of criticism. The creator should defend themselves and not rely on someone else’s opinions to serve as their defense, it’s kind of sad that you guys don’t bother to justify the website yourselves given the fact that you are the creators.
There’s a point where everyone will be rejected on this website- creators will be get old and lose their looks and so will anyone who enters if they decide to stick to using the website years forward. In other words, the creators has to reject themselves at some point (the point where they turn ugly). Beauty is not an absolute thing because the standards were are changing, super large foreheads was once considered attractive, and not so anymore. Time is absolute.
I personally see this website for pure thrills, it doesn’t have much substance and it’s not about substance. So if a mate was looking for substance, this is not the website to go to. If you just want looks, go for this website. Of course the conventional good looking people who want substance probably won’t want to go to this website. There is absolutely no proof that the website holds people who are beyond good looking, the site is not here to emphasize that.
In browsing your hot or not voting section of the site, I have noticed a lot of fake photos, people who are putting up pictures thant aren’t them. Heck, one was a pic of a pornstar! Need to find a way to ensure “quality control” for honesty of members pics.
“thant…”
yeah, its a typo…